Re: BeamRaC=er® ;-) and Reloaded Boards

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:21:23 +0100
Message-Id: <CC76847F-EF0C-41FB-A1D7-1AB85FAFBAC1_at_wfmh.org.pl>
> On 2020-01-02, at 19:00, laughton_at_cyg.net wrote:
> 
>> "bring your board under microscope, cut the 12th 0,0Xmm wide trace out of 37 running close to each other, then .... "
> 
> Hmmm, yeah... I can see how that suggestion might not appeal to all users!  :)

Right. That's what I thought too :-)

>> I have to fiddle somewhere in the middle (of the transmission line).
> 
> No easy answer, then.
> 
> Would it make sense it install a noninverting buffer IC and break the signal path into *two* transmission lines?  There are some really tiny, single-gate IC's available in 6-pin SMD packages, and the prop delay is generally 3 ns or less.

One of ideas we also brainstormed was in fact to buffer the signal and split the line. I suppose it would require a fast buffer (like what you mention) with Schmitt-trigger input. But since we couldn't easily test it (I don't even have anything similar at hand), and it might still be not enough with 2Vpp ringing out there.

> A quick plug re these IC's:  I can't promise they're the solution to the issue at hand, but these IC's do offer a *lot* of problem-solving power.  Anyone who enjoys hacking hardware should become familiar with them, IMO.  For an overview, see my post on anycpu.org  "Tiny, superfast gates rival programmable logic"
> 
> http://anycpu.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=270&p=1803

Yes, I'll certainly get my hands dirty on those.

-- 
SD! 
Received on 2020-05-30 00:05:20

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.