> On 29/01/2020 14:25, silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl wrote: > >>> Though they changed the masks which was expensive they didn't want to >>> introduce new part numbers. >> >> No, but the revision would be expected to change, wouldn't it? It looks like a negligence to me. Might even be deliberate like with 8521s labeled as 6526s. > > On 2020-01-29, at 14:38, Frank Wolf <webmaster_at_frank-wolf.org> wrote: > > Changing the revision would have forced them to use new part/order numbers for the customers. Sure about it? I recall ordering chips for the service back then and receiving different revisions, despite the same SKU being used all the time. -- SD!Received on 2020-05-30 00:29:53
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.