Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2020, 14:19:53 CEST schrieb Gerrit Heitsch: > On 6/19/20 1:43 PM, silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl wrote: > >> On 2020-06-19, at 13:04, groepaz_at_gmx.net wrote: > >>>> Since you consistently use singular above, which CIA position matters? > >>> > >>> The tests in the zip use CIA1 to prevent any interference with the IEC > >>> bus > >>> (which shouldnt be a problem, but who knows). In a C128 thats U1, afaik. > >> > >> i attached another zip on the ticket at sourceforge, which contains the > >> tests for CIA2 - so you can run both if you have different ones in the > >> machine.> > > I took the one from: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/vice-emu/bugs/_discuss/thread/ > > > > 538e31942f/ba33/attachment/cia-shiftregister-tests.zip > > > > There's discrepancy on the naming between readme and files: > > > > ... Now run the "delay2-new" and "delay-old" ... > > > > there's "delay2-old. But.. > > > > Both CIAs are marked 1386 (I expect it to be "new") > > No, datecode 1386 is still an NMOS CIA and therefore an old one. The > switchover came at the end of 1986 on the 250466 boards. Datecode 4x86 > is likely to be new. Thats what makes the whole thing really really weird - 4485 is before the switch. Meanwhile we got a few more reports, and can probably also be sure that testing on C128 vs C64 isnt the cause of the difference either (which would be weird as well). So if anyone has CIAs with timestamp of 4485, or very close to that, please join the testing :) -- http://hitmen.eu http://ar.pokefinder.org http://vice-emu.sourceforge.net http://magicdisk.untergrund.net Sie werden hinnehmen müssen, daß der Gesetzgeber in Sachen Vorratsdatenspeicherung anderer Meinung ist als Sie. Vorratsdatenspeicherung hat mit Terrorismusbekämpfung relativ wenig zu tun. Ich wäre für die Vorratsdatenspeicherung auch dann, wenn es überhaupt keinen Terrorismus gäbe. <Dieter Wiefelspütz , SPD>Received on 2020-06-19 15:01:32
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.