It seems this mod was not done on the original Rev 6 PCB but only on Rev7. The only difference I could see when comparing two Rev7 boards, is that the one with the mod board has slower, 200ns, DRAM. I put my cheap logic analyzer on it and captures what seemed like the relevant signals. Excuse the messy looking /DOT, it is a 24mhz capture so it can't quite capture /DOT properly. The mod board pushes back the rising edge of /RAS (/RAS_FF is signal changed by mod PCB) to be closer to /CAS which makes me suspicious it was a workaround to be able to use 200ns DRAM instead of 150ns. Image: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AtH4vpaZnzX7kv19R15LKRhaqtRiSg?e=Uy3et2 Saleae Logic file: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AtH4vpaZnzX7kv1-yP-l4nFGsPauag?e=7TBRe1 I need to get the computer back to its owner but if you want any other signals captures, I have three channels left. Just let me know quickly, say by 19 July, 2020 _at_ 4:00PM Central Time (GMT-6). Jeff Birt -----Original Message----- From: Francesco Messineo <francesco.messineo_at_gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 10:53 AM To: cbm-hackers_at_musoftware.de Subject: Re: C128 'VIC tower' mod board > >> > >> It would be interesting to watch /RAS before and after the extra > >> circuit on the scope to see what kind of difference it makes. > > > > That flip flop is doing basically two things: > > 1) it lowers the Q output (/RAS to the RAMs) as soon (with a small > > delay) as the input /RAS goes low, the "original" /RAS is connected > > to the async reset of the FF > > 2) it raises the /RAS to the RAM at the next rising edge of the /DOT > > (I assume it's a dot clock negated?) input (this goes into the FF > > clock input). > yes I stand corrected. The rising edge will happen at the next rising /DOT AFTER the "input" /RAS has risen too. yes, it lengthens and re-align the rising edge of /RAS to a rising edge of /DOT, so probably the edge align was the real necessity.Received on 2020-07-19 06:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.