> On 2020-08-05, at 02:23, tokafondo <tokafondo_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > They should be called 8572/3, then shouldn't it? Not necessarily at all 6526 -> 8521 6567 -> 8562 6569 -> 8565 and so on. > It seems the 8569 could be the nearest one, as it's the VIC-II included in > PAL-N variant of C128. > > And I ask: can a '128 VIC retrofitted to a C64? Never checked if VIC-IIe has only superset of VIC-II pins or there are differences in how they function (e.g. what clock output is set at power up). In the first case a passive adapter should allow such retrofit. -- SD!Received on 2020-08-05 12:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.