Den 2021-06-18 kl. 11:22, skrev silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl: > Checking the second video I linked-to, it surely doesn't expose any of > the typical fakes' attributes. The dude's final assertion might make > some sense. >> Someone should decap one :) > Absolutely! This chip has also been discussed in the Facebook group Commodore International Historical Society. Everyone of the old alumni have confirmed, either directly or indirectly, that they have no recollection of a chip with this name. Some people have brought out the theory that it would be a 6562/6563 chip, i.e. the VIC-40 one that was supposed to be driven with fast SRAM before the VIC-II was developed. I believe this theory doesn't hold water because the VIC-40 must've been cancelled well ahead of the C64 was released in July-August 1982, and here we're looking at chips with date stamps weeks 9-18 of 1983, i.e. a good six months after the C64 reached the market. If Commodore still wanted a cheaper alternative, there was the MAX Machine that was planned for worldwide release but only made it to Japan. Also the TED project must've been initiated (in Japan?) in the spring of 1983 as the first developer boards were sent out in August. Unless it is a modern fake, it could be a ploy chip from back in the day. It has been pointed out that prototype chips usually were ceramic and the plastic casing wasn't used until larger production runs. I realized that the 6530 RRIOT comes in many variations of which numbers 01-40 and 44-50 are recognized on Wikipedia. Some of those chips have other part numbers though. My idea is that perhaps -42 is another RRIOT variation but I don't know why the prefix VIC would be used with that. Also I don't know if the numbering of those RRIOT chips makes room for another one in the spring of 1983. I found a reseller first offering these chips for $5.95 each. The one on eBay first charged $9.95, but once he had sold 20 in a day he raised his price first to $39.95 and then $49.95 as he suddenly saw there was a demand for them. That kind of action is strange. If he figured out the chip is super rare to begin with, why list it at $9.95? I still think these chips are well made fakes, even if neither alcohol nor acetone are able to wipe off the print. Best regards Anders CarlssonReceived on 2021-06-18 17:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.