> So vertically we don't seem to be able to cover the entire screen it > seems but horizontally (except the last one/two rasterlines) that's no > problem I take. Shall try to adapt the POKEs from Anders and see where > I get with them. The resolution of 224x284 is the maximum the C= 1084 can display in PAL when squeezing the image (with the last rasterline always being the border-color). I confirmed this with my own 1084 and I think I also did the tests for NTSC back then and the results were incorporated into VICE for "Normal"-border mode. Not sure where the values for "Full" and "Debug"-border mode come from, but "Normal" is the max visible area. You can try my little "ColorRun"-game, which fills either the right or left side of the picture with one of the 16 colors and you have to pick the lighter one: https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=67091 I used the maximum visible area for the separate PAL- and NTSC-versions, but since the last rasterline is always border-color I kept two rasterlines at the top the border-color as well. Where are you going with this? > BTW - does `xvic` emulate the "interlaced" mode of NTSC VC-20? Since pretty recently it does, thanks to groepaz and Mike's efforts and my trusty NTSC-VIC-20 providing the test-results :) tokraReceived on 2021-09-01 22:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.