I think you're optimistic to think that people will go out of their way to support this. On 17/05/2022 21:00, tokafondo wrote: > > But I think that happens with "existing, classic" software, doesn't > it? I mean... software made from now on could not depend on CBM Basic, > or at least have the routines included when compiling, provided that > there is source code available to include them. And this is more a > question than an affirmation. >Received on 2022-05-18 00:03:24
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.