> On 2022-09-04, at 06:04, ruud_at_baltissen.org wrote: > >> ... but other than that? > > Unless you are talking about a 14 MHz version. No, I don't need higher clock frequencies > what's wrong with the original one then? 1) they aren't officially available[*] so one has to count on some rather dubious sources, which sell "NOS"[**] ones, and 2) its DIP "footprint" is imposing limits I'm not too happy with * - unless I am missing a reliable source with some stock and reasonable prices ** - with acid cleaned corroded pins falling away at first mechanical strain, one-side sanded and spray-painted over, that peel-off in cleaning bathReceived on 2022-09-04 18:00:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.