Re: SuperPET 6702 IC

From: ruud_at_baltissen.org
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 21:25:01 +0200
Message-ID: <35c0479c3e0962d3fc8ed4dec547e79d_at_baltissen.org>
   Herzlichen Dank / thank you very much!

Not just for the links but also for the work that was involved.


Frank Wolf schreef op 2022-10-22 16:53:
> You might want to take a look here:
> 
> http://forum.6502.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6674
> https://www.forum64.de/index.php?thread/116391-mos6702-superpet-dongle-dissected/&postID=1695189
> 
> 
> 
> On 22.10.2022 16:30, ruud_at_baltissen.org wrote:
>> Hallo allemaal,
>> 
>> 
>> I once had a SuperPET but sold it. Main reason: I want to tinker with 
>> computers I have and tinkering with a perfect SuperPET is not done 
>> IMHO. The idea was to create my own upgrade to turn a 8032, 8096 or 
>> 8296 into a SuperPET anyway. To avoid inventing the wheel twice I did 
>> some research lately and found two old projects:
>> https://forum.vcfed.org/index.php?threads/commodore-8032-add-on-board-superpet.49423/page-4 
>> https://github.com/nils-eilers/uMMF
>> 
>> I was able to contact Dave, the owner of the first project and he 
>> pointed me to the 6702. I completely forgot about that one. To make it 
>> short: what is known about it now? Bo Zimmerman's site still says 
>> nothing is known and I found a PDF that mentions patching the various 
>> Waterloo disks.
>> 
>> But I wonder: hasn't anybody tried a brute force attack yet? And you 
>> don't have to start from zero; Mike Naberezny wrote the document I 
>> mentioned above so the routines that approach the 6702 are known, 
>> including input and output: Waterloo-D64-Disk-Patches.pdf
>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjRo4ThgfT6AhVMPewKHaO6BfMQFnoECEUQAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmikenaberezny.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2FWaterloo-D64-Disk-Patches.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0r69W200tHnCnujugkTap9 
>> If I create a board, I won't use the same, IMHO stupid, idea of 
>> powering the 6502 off so the 6809 can access the bus. I'm using a 
>> 65816 anyway and it can be tri-stated, so why not making use of it? 
>> Another advantage (I think), the 6502/65816 can continue after the 
>> instruction it gave to activate the 6809.
>> 
>> Any comment, ideas, etc is welcome!
>> 
>> 

-- 

Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Ruud Baltissen

www.Baltissen.org
Received on 2022-10-22 22:03:20

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.