Just to clarify: The 8250/SFD-1001 uses a Matsushita JU-570 or JU-570-2 drive mech. The C900 uses a JA-560-012 drive mech and the serial number on mine is in the 100s. I have never seen another drive in the wild. Other than the C900 documentation, I have not been able to find any other info on these drives. Hope this helps. Santo On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 7:15 AM Francesco Messineo < francesco.messineo_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:04 PM Michal Pleban <lists_at_michau.name> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > Francesco Messineo wrote on 10.01.2024 16:45: > > > > > according to this page > > > https://www.zimmers.net/cbmpics/c900.html > > > The 900 has a 96 tpi floppy drive, the 8250 has (for sure) 100 tpi > > > drives. > > > > I am not entirely sure that this info is correct (see how it also says > > it's 1.2 MB whereas the disks have in fact 1.0 MB capacity). I do know > > that the disk drive interface is identical to the one used in the > > 8250LP. The C900 documentation states that MFM support is incomplete, > > and only GCR is used in the disk controller code, so they would not need > > to bother with 96 TPI MFM disks. The C900 mech is also outwardly > > identical to the one from the 8250LP except it has a grey faceplate, so > > I think there's good chance it is simply the same 100 TPI mech. > > > > if it supports only GCR (I assume the same format as the 8250?) then > why you need > to bother with MFM ? > If you know the actual format used it's easy to tell what is the > mechanism they used, if it's 80 tracks per side, then it's 96 TPI, if > it's 77 tracks per side, then it's 100 TPI. > Frank > > Regards, > > Michau. > > > >Received on 2024-01-11 14:00:16
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.