RE: 6510 in FPGA works!!

ncoplin_at_orbeng.com
Date: 2002-04-17 06:05:29

  • Next message: Professor Dredd: "Re: SSv5 + REU + T232?"
    Hello Gideon,
    
    >The people that also read the "CommodoreOne" message board probably already
    >know that some time ago I started implementing a 6502 core and a 6510
    
    I'm glad you posted it here also!!
    
    >PS. Milestone one has been reached... let's look forward to the second: a
    >6502/6510 with sdram, and to further 'releases' of the 32-bit version!
    
    I've always wondered about this so hopefully someone knows the answer. If
    the address and data was stored in a tri-state latch connected to the bus at
    the 6510 socket, and the clocking signal allowed to pass though.... would
    the address read or write occur for each cycle available (ie use "ready" and
    "clock" to enable the address output).
    
    I ask this because a socket processor upgrade needs to write to the
    mainboard's RAM and IO, regardless of how much of its own RAM it has. The
    mainboard RAM access is controlled by the VIC so timing is fixed to 1us.
    
    - Nick
    
    
    PLEASE TAKE NOTE:
    
    The contents of this email (including any attachments) may be
    privileged and confidential. Any unauthorised use of the contents
    is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
    please advise us immediately (you can contact us by telephone
    on +61 8 9441 2311 by reverse charge) and then permanently
    delete this email together with any attachments. We appreciate
    your co-operation.
    
    Whilst Orbital endeavours to take reasonable care to ensure
    that this email and any attachments are free from viruses or other
    defects, Orbital does not represent or warrant that such is explicitly
    the case
    
    (C) 2000: Orbital Engine Company (Australia) PTY LTD and its
    affiliates
    
    
           Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
    

    Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.