Re: Another file question (PET)

From: Marko Mäkelä (marko.makela_at_hut.fi)
Date: 2002-11-18 19:28:51

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 06:30:01PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> After some digging, I found that this gets even better: The Commodore B
> machines have SETNAM - but it needs different parameters.

Yes, I know that too well.  But it's astonishing that the same cbmlink file
or disk copier binaries work without patching in VIC-20, C64, C128 and in
the 264 series.  The PET and the CBM II require their own versions of the
programs - the PET even for every ROM version.

> No wonder, Commodore went bancrupt:-)

Yes, acquiring Amiga only postponed that destiny, by some eight years.

	Marko

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.