Re: Another file question (PET)

From: Andre Fachat (a.fachat_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2002-11-20 00:26:52 

Yes. Indeed. I think I still have a very old comparision chart
between different versions of PET BASIC somewhere (BASIC3 vs. 
BASIC4). The memory map has quite some differences in it. 

Andre

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:30:58PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:28:51PM +0200, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> > Yes, I know that too well.  But it's astonishing that the same cbmlink file
> > or disk copier binaries work without patching in VIC-20, C64, C128 and in
> > the 264 series.  The PET and the CBM II require their own versions of the
> > programs - the PET even for every ROM version.
> 
> Does that mean that even within the PET series, the jump table or zero page
> usage differs?
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
>         Uz
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
> 
>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.