From: Maciej Witkowiak (ytm_at_elysium.pl)
Date: 2005-04-02 16:00:21
Gabor Lenart dnia 31 mar 2005 o 11:48 +0200 napisał:
> > Contiki (uses o65 for "programs" on 6502 platforms), maybe Lunix once it wakes
> > up from its hiatus:-)
>
> Tough I've only checked Lunix for a while some years (?) ago, Lunix Next
> Generation (LNG) site (http://lng.sf.net) say that site is updated
> at 2004 Sep 10, so it is not so old and dead? From the site:
Sorry for the late answer, I missed most of the thread. Some comments about
LUnix: it uses cc65 toolchain for building o65 apps. The only imported symbol
is the base address of syscalls jumptable. Programs export their entry point
but this is currently ignored. No additional features are used as far as I
remember.
> * Support for o65 object format (it means that apps can be written using cc65 asm and (soon) C suite)
Greg King has written nearly (?) complete C library support code. We agreed that
this code should be distributed with cc65. Once he believes it is 'ready',
he'll contact Uz :). Otherwise, ca65+ld65 should be used for any new apps.
ytm
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.