From: Patrycjusz R. £ogiewa (silverdr_at_inet.com.pl)
Date: 2005-08-19 11:05:55
On 2005-08-19, at 03:08, Richard wrote:
>
> In article <CDFF9EE1-EBBC-415E-84CC-73D4BB456DC6@inet.com.pl>,
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?"Patrycjusz_R._=A3ogiewa"?=
> <silverdr@inet.com.pl> writes:
>
>
>> Making the board wouldn't probably be that difficult as writing the
>> firmware for it... [...]
>>
>
> You miss the point. I don't have time to make boards.
I was only adding to your lack of time to make the board - that you
would need even much more time writing the firmware. The board could
possibly be designed by several persons on this forum within two
evenings but I think nobody would take on the task of quickly writing
firmware for it. Therefore I wasn't saying "go and make the board"
but rather "even if you had the time to make the board - you wouldn't
get any use of it without the firmware".
As Groepaz suggested: check C2N232 - it certainly won't be as fast as
IDE64 but might be your best bet anyway.
--
Software, n.:
The parts of a computer system that can not be kicked.
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.