silverdr_at_inet.com.pl
Date: 2005-11-09 00:01:11
On 2005-11-08, at 10:06, Baltissen, GJPAA (Ruud) wrote:
> Hallo Spiro,
>
>> The overhead
>> of transferring more data (320 byte vs. 256 byte) might be
>> less than the
>> time you gain by moving the decoding into the computer.
>
> IMHO that is just shifting the problem AND loosing time because you
> have to
> send more data.
I'll have to check how much faster those routines are. If they are
more than 1.25 times faster but won't fit in the drive's RAM then it
will certainly be worth to shift the decoding responsibility to the
computer.
--
Talking to oneself is not a sign of good health...
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.