silverdr_at_inet.com.pl
Date: 2005-11-23 10:26:22
On 2005-11-23, at 02:38, Groepaz wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2005 02:11, Christopher Phillips wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2005, at 03:29, Anders Carlsson wrote:
>>> I can understand the desire to be the best or fastest, but for
>>> practical
>>> use, does it matter if it takes 20, 25 or 30 seconds to convert a
>>> floppy
>>> to a disk image?
>>
>> Well, if it's part of your edit-compile-run cycle on final hardware
>> testing of your demo, and the seconds are ticking away until the last
>> moment in time you can submit your entry, it can certainly *seem*
>> important ;)
>
> but for that, wouldnt you want to write a disc image to a floppy
> and not the
> other way around? :=P
heh :-) Right. But the companion tool is planned too. And most of
this discussion will apply to it as well :-P
--
Nie twierdzę, że Windowsy są najlepsze, ale póki co nikt nic
lepszego nie wymyślił. - from p.c.s.a.
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.