From: Spiro Trikaliotis (ml-cbmhackers_at_trikaliotis.net)
Date: 2006-03-02 11:25:24
Hello,
* On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:23:21AM +0100 silverdr@inet.com.pl wrote:
[...]
> but I don't agree with the statement that required timing (in a
> multitasking env) can be achieved only with massive computing power
> of todays CPUs and answer the question "if it could be done with
> [...] a 100MHz Pentium-1". The answer remains "yes", even if there
> are conditions to that. ;-)
Agreed, especially since I am running cbm4win on a K6-2/400 on NT4. Oh,
I forgot: My first attempt (2001?) was even on a K6/233 (NT4), AND IT
WORKED! Notice that this is all without too much special help from
interrupts (with the exception of just one interrupt for the "listener
hold-off", cf. http://www.trikaliotis.net/cbm4win.shtml#faq_hw: "Why
are the X1541 or XE1541 cables not supported?").
Regards,
Spiro.
--
Spiro R. Trikaliotis
http://www.trikaliotis.net/
http://cbm4win.sf.net/
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.