Re: How good is "disksuck" by Highlander/FLT ?

Ruud_at_baltissen.org
Date: 2006-03-03 22:49:47

• Next message: Claus Just Rasmussen: "Re: IEEE 488 used to connect at PC directly to SFD 1001"
• Previous message: Ruud_at_baltissen.org: "Re: PET memory expansion"
• In reply to: simon: "Re: How good is "disksuck" by Highlander/FLT ?"
• Next in thread: Ruud_at_baltissen.org: "Re: IEEE 488 used to connect at PC directly to SFD 1001"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hallo Simon,


> b) know of a schematic I can use to construct one that uses commonly
> available components and not old MOS chips

http://www.baltissen.org/htm/cbmhd.htm


--
    ___
   / __|__
  / /  |_/     Groetjes, Ruud
  \ \__|_\
   \___|       http://Ruud.C64.org





       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

• Next message: Claus Just Rasmussen: "Re: IEEE 488 used to connect at PC directly to SFD 1001"
• Previous message: Ruud_at_baltissen.org: "Re: PET memory expansion"
• In reply to: simon: "Re: How good is "disksuck" by Highlander/FLT ?"
• Next in thread: Ruud_at_baltissen.org: "Re: IEEE 488 used to connect at PC directly to SFD 1001"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.