silverdr_at_inet.com.pl
Date: 2006-06-22 00:11:26
On 2006-06-18, at 17:22, Tim Schürmann wrote:
>>>> has anyone successfully built opencbm 0.4.0 under recent 2.6.1x
>>>> Linux
>>>> kernel?
>>>
>>> Yes, on SuSE 10.0 with Kernel 2.6.13.
>>>
>>> Did you get an error message on your system?
>>
>> Yes, but I didn't have time to study the reasons. Wanted to know if
>> it should compile at all first. Will come back to it then. Did you do
>> anything special or it just compiled OOB?
>
> I just compiled it OOB, but there are maybe some pitfalls:
>
> If you get a message about missing sgmltools or something regarding
> the
> documents and/or if you get a message about an missing "mnib"
>
> then just ignore these messages. The docs and the additional tool
> "mnib"
> won't be build, but the rest is working as it should (these two parts
> aren't neccesary).
>
> Another problem could be the compiler; but I didn't know which version
> leads to a compiler error (Spiro?).
AFAIR it was a problem during linking phase and ld has thrown the
error message. Should be able to check it more thoroughly within a
week or so, thanks.
--
Democracy, n.: The triumph of popularity over principle.
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.