On Sat 19 Feb 2011 at 01:31:33 +0100, Rhialto wrote: > Also, with the 18 x going through the loop instead of 16 x, it looks > like it does it too often, which results in the wrong answer by a factor > of 4... Ah, no, I misread that. Since we're working on 3-byte values here, the loop needs to be done 24 x and it was $18 in that source. -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- There's no point being grown-up if you \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- can't be childish sometimes. -The 4th Doctor X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H* Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2011-02-19 01:00:22
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.