Re: petSD project page

From: Steve Gray <*sjgray_at_rogers.com*> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <762372.24397.qm@web88204.mail.re2.yahoo.com> · sjgray_at_rogers.com

It would be cool to have both interfaces, but even cooler if it translated 
interfaces in both directions. Plug into the PET and you have the SD but it also 
converts IEEE to IEC. Plug into the C64 and it converts IEC to IEEE. 

Steve

----- Original Message ----
> From: Rhialto <rhialto@falu.nl>
> To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
> Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 7:21:49 PM
> Subject: Re: petSD project page
> 
> On Mon 13 Jun 2011 at 21:47:44 -0500, Jim Brain wrote:
> > Over the years, there's been lots of effort to reduce RAM
> > requirements in sd2iec (I helped a bit in the FAT library), but the
> 
> In the opposite direction: would it make sense to have both IEEE-488 and
> IEC connectors on a petSD? That way it is more universally useable.
> I could use one, or two, I think, especially if I can share between
> PETs and 64s.
> 
> -Olaf.
> -- 
> ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert  -- There's no point being grown-up if you 
> \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl    -- can't be childish sometimes. -The 4th Doctor
> 
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
> 

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list