Ethan Dicks wrote: > 3032 (pre-CRTC, BASIC2) [..] c2n232 [..] not [..] work Hm, that is bad evidence. Perhaps like Marko wrote, the code should be evaluated in emulation. I suppose using the secondary tape port won't make any difference, as it isn't the actual transfer that is the problem, it is the interception and execution of commands from the PC side. I'll see if I get a chance to try the VIC setup. Like I wrote, the only computer I remember it worked really well on was a 8032 which is a bit of a shame as it is a cool piece of hardware. It makes me wonder about a prlink or PC64 cable connected to the userport, if the cbmlink driver for those cables has similar issues on the 3032/4032. Best regards Anders Carlsson Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-10-15 16:00:05
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.