Hello Rob, Saturday, December 1, 2012, 11:47:58 AM, you wrote: > Hmm, thanks Julian - I have checked and adjusted the speed with the > 8296D diagnostic tool and it claims they are bang on. It also measures > the variation, which it also claims is OK. Should I have reason not to > trust it? I'm not familiar with the diagnostics tool (wouldn't mind a copy, actually - I have an 8296LP). With a 1541 format, the whole track is overwritten with Sync ($FF) bytes (about a track and a half), then a chunk of NON sync bytes ($55, or 01010101) is written out, guestimated to be about 1/2 the track. Sync and Non-sync bytes are counted, and the ratio used to calculate the number of "tail" bytes" after the data sector. I can't see that there would be much difference between that, and the higher density 8050 format. Once again, with the 1540/1541, whilst data is read from a shift register after the data is clocked in, Sync is detected by a separate circuit (integrated into a single chip in the case of the 1541). The thing I can't understand is that 5 sync marks are written out whenever you write out a data block - and you say that works OK. If there was a problem reading sync marks written by that analogue board when (re)writing sectors, then you would get error 22 (Data block not found) messages on sectors rewritten using that drive - but you don't.. More thinking (and rom study) is needed :) Julian > rob > On 01/12/2012 01:41, Julian Perry wrote: >> Rob >> >> You will get that problem if the drive spindle is running to fast. >> >> Julian >> >> >> Saturday, December 1, 2012, 11:17:18 AM, you wrote: >> >>> Gents, >>> I would not normally post 'please help me fix' type questions here but >>> this one has me stumped. Some may already have seen the thread on >>> vintage-computer forums here: >>> http://www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum/showthread.php?34572-8050-Floppy-Repair >>> In a nutshell, drive 1 works 100%, drive 0 will read and write but not >>> format. It usually stops on track 1 with a #21 read error but >>> occasionally will go as far as track 3 or 4. If I swap the mechanisms, >>> the problem stays with drive1. This implies a problem in the analogue >>> board (micropolis pcb #8050006) but I can't find it and I don't >>> understand what kind of problem would allow it to write but not format. >>> I know the mechanisms are good and well aligned and, as the drives read >>> OK, they are properly speed adjusted. >>> Do any of you disk wizards know the algorithms by which these drives >>> format a disk? I hoped this might give me a clue. >>> Rob >>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> >> > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list -- Best regards, Julian mailto:jp@digitaltapestries.com Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-12-01 15:00:46
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.