> On 2016-03-30, at 00:27, groepaz@gmx.net wrote: > >>>> I don't think the values at the bottom are correct though. That's why I >>>> look for that 64er speed test or whatever it was called. >>> >>> beware! that program doesnt init the TOD correctly, so the 50/60Hz bit is >>> at 60Hz on PAL - and the values (including those in the wiki) come out >>> wrong >> I see - but it shouldn't be /that/ much off as it seems to be, if it was >> only the TOD difference. > > well, its 20% afterall That's what I mean. The values on the wiki (for DD3) seem to be over 200% off. At least for LOAD. Other are more in range. -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-03-29 23:00:28
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.