I think it's a great idea, I will check... no but I was thinking to do it... I'll replace the 74LS138 + 74LS04 by a GAL I'll have more control thanks On 30/03/2016 11:26, groepaz@gmx.net wrote: > perhaps crosstalk between bit 0 of the address bus and some data line? did you > gate the address with the clock? > > On Wednesday 30 March 2016, 11:20:26 didier derny <didier@aida.org> wrote: >> not really specifically tested at other addresses but initially I found >> that my code was working or not working >> simply by editing the code, it was a long process to reduce the code to >> 2 instructions >> >> I can try at several addresses >> >> in anycase the chip is always at the same address. it's decoded by a >> 74LS138 + 74LS04 >> >> as the ch376 is faster than the 6502 I was thinking that the data could >> be removed from the bus >> by the ch376 before the 6502 got them... >> >> but why do I find a difference when the code doing the read is placed at >> odd or even addresses... >> >> the ch376 as 2 ports DATA and COMMAND/STATUS >> >> this code read the directory of usb key >> if the read is at odd addreses I get the right directory content >> if the read is at even addresses I get 00 >> >> the commands works, reading the directory involves several commands all >> working >> >> On 30/03/2016 10:37, A. Fachat wrote: >>> Am 30. März 2016 10:15:24 schrieb didier derny <didier@aida.org>: >>>> I have a problem with a read with a 6502 >>>> >>>> I read a data on a register (from a CH376S) >>>> >>>> I have the following code: >>>> *= 2000 >>>> >>>> readdata LDA CH376data >>>> >>>> RTS >>>> >>>> this code always get the wrong value >>>> >>>> *= 2001 >>>> >>>> readdata LDA CH376data >>>> >>>> RTS >>>> >>>> now with this code I get the right value... >>> That could be a broken address line to the IO chip or a timing issue >>> in the address decode depending on the addresses. >>> >>> André >>> >>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-03-30 10:00:41
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.