Re: MAX Machine PLA

From: Gerrit Heitsch <*gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de*> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 14:38:09 +0200 Message-ID: <d80bd997-94e3-4cb9-ce89-33d3b64aa54f@laosinh.s.bawue.de> · gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de

On 07/31/2016 04:48 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Same with VIC-II: the 6566 is a very nice and clean design (what I can
> reconstruct from it anyway, I haven't seen an actual die photo)...  The
> DRAM versions, not so very clean.

The interesting part would be to compare the 6566 and 6567 dies to see 
what was changed and how much is the same. Where did they squeeze in the 
refresh counter, the RAS/CAS logic, were things moved around for it...

  Gerrit

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list