Re: MAX Machine PLA

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 23:04:38 +0100
Message-ID: <0b1e3698-6df4-73a6-9a2d-2751b8e5b2c5@null.net>
On 07/08/2016 14:52, Gerrit Heitsch wrote:
> Usually, MOS counted upwards, meaning the 6566 would have come before 
> the 6567. So either the static version came first or there was another 
> version, like a 6565.

Obviously the static ram version existed by the time the numbers were 
assigned, but we have no evidence of when that was.


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2016-08-07 23:00:02

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.