On 15/11/2017 11:48, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: > Illegal Opcodes were never guaranteed. If you want those to work, you > have to stick to 6502 from MOS, everyone else might have made small > changes to the mask or the process which caused some illegal opcodes > to behave differently. In terms of the second source suppliers, I believe they were under contractual obligation to produce exactly what MOS told them & if there are variances then you'll see them in MOS chips too. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-11-15 14:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.