Hallo Nick,
> The {} method is perhaps the easiest to standardise to with the option of
> expressing things as both {code} and {function}, eg {28} is equivalent to
> {red}
>
> any thoughts?
I'm not sure what you mean with the last question. So I cut that conversion
tables out of my program:
Ctrl1 : array[0..31] of string[8] =
('' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,'white' ,'' ,''
,'dish' ,'ensh' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,'return' ,'swlc' ,''
,'' ,'down' ,'rvon' ,'home' ,'del' ,'' ,'' ,''
,'' ,'' ,'' ,'esc' ,'red' ,'->' ,'green' ,'blue');
Ctrl2 : array[0..31] of string[8] =
('' ,'orange','' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,''
,'' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,'' ,'shreturn','swuc' ,''
,'black' ,'up' ,'rvof' ,'clr' ,'inst' ,'brown' ,'ltred' ,'grey1'
,'grey2' ,'ltgree','ltblue','grey3' ,'purple','<-' ,'yellow','cyan');
The first block translates the values 0 to 31, the second 128 to 159. See the
Prog. Ref. Guide if you don't understand the abreviations. So a BASIC line can
look like this:
20 print "First line{down}{left}{left}second line"
Groetjes, Ruud.
-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.