Re: C= IC's

From: Dave R. (watson_at_enteract.com)
Date: 2000-11-30 15:20:52

Next message: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: C= IC's"
Previous message: Ruud Baltissen: "C= IC's"
In reply to: Ruud Baltissen: "C= IC's"
Next in thread: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: C= IC's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 05:08 AM 11/30/00 +0100, Ruud Baltissen wrote:

Here's what I was able to get this morning from CMD's pricelist...

>318018-02 - Revision 02 C-128 BASIC ROM
>318019-02 - Revision 02 C-128 BASIC ROM
>318020-03 - Revision 03 C-128 Kernal ROM
>8563R9 C-128 VDC
>8565R2 - VIC-II??
>8566R3 - VIC-II for C-128 PAL
>8568 - VIC-II?
>8580 - SID from the 64C and 128




   :::::      Dave Ross / Dr. Watson          "Yesterday's technology
::    ===  watson@enteract.com              today...for a better
::    ===                                    tomorrow!"
   :::::      http://www.enteract.com/~watson

-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.

Next message: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: C= IC's"
Previous message: Ruud Baltissen: "C= IC's"
In reply to: Ruud Baltissen: "C= IC's"
Next in thread: Marko Mäkelä: "Re: C= IC's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.