Hmm. I wasn't really planning to reply to this, but considering that I felt
that I needed some sort of test-mail...
Steve Judd wrote:
> Guys,
>
> A humble request: could we return to technical discussions of personal
> Commodore projects, things upon which we are knowledgable or experienced,
> or otherwise hackerly subjects?
Well, the Jeri-board discussion had some interesting technical aspects,
IMHO. But, you're right, I suppose.
> Last time I checked, the only person who has actually contributed to
> Jeri's board -- time, effort, and physical work, not just words and
> pontifications -- is Jeri.
But doesn't that argument hold against any "personal Commodore project"? This
one just got a bit bigger. I know what you're hinting at, and I do agree
with you, but where does it start to get off-topic?
> This is starting to feel like comp.sys.cbm, not cbm-hackers.
Sadly, though, comp.sys.cbm has been 'degrading' in a certain way. The
Joseph Rose Incident may have had an (undesired ?) side effect - the amount
of knowledgable people seems to have seriously dropped. Comp.emulators.cbm
is dying an even more evident death.
Martijn (Still working on that IEEE-to-IEC project, but finding very little
time to do so, and even less motivation to read the hieroglyphs called
"ANSI/IEEE Std 488.1-1987")
--
Martijn van Buul - Pino@dohd.org - http://www.stack.nl/~martijnb/
Geek code: G-- - Visit OuterSpace: mud.stack.nl 3333
Kees J. Bot: The sum of CPU power and user brain power is a constant.
-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.