Hello, "Martijn van Buul" wrote: > Ruud Baltissen wrote: > > Hallo allemaal, > > > > The text. Please, enjoy. I'l return to the @#$#@! decoding of my signals for > > the PC-card :) > *gasp* That's exactly what I fell myself. > Well, the PCI protocol is well defined, but not as easy to implement as the > ISA bus. The *simplest* implementation I saw used an FPGA to do the actual > interfacing to the PCI bus. PCI is defininately not a Geek Port. Well, that's my thought, too. Anyway, why not implement all in an FPGA? The "only" problem which remains: Where to get the PCI core? > > One thing is clear: forget Windows :) > > #### Linux ???? > I think you can safely rule out *any* multitasking system. It introduces > latencies and delays which are clearly unacceptible. What about VxWorks (or any other *hard* RT system)? I would not rule that out "per se". (Although, I don't think it would be highly available at the hobbyist's...) I'll have to look at the whole description (and the schematics) at home with a lot of time... But it sounds *very* interesting! Spiro. - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.