Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour

From: Jason Robertson (jkr_at_westol.com)
Date: 2002-04-08 05:18:23

Next message: Raymond C. Bryan: "Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour"

Previous message: Craig LeVay: "Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour"
In reply to: Jason Robertson: "Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 22:36:44 -0400, Jason Robertson <jkr@westol.com>
wrote:

>Hmm, Apple providing 6510 type enhanced C64 chips... sounds like
>blasphemy to me from CBM's most vile enemy ;-)

I forgot to add: "ducks and runs" since some of you use Apples
:o)

Now back to seriousness:

Does it have a compatible instruction set I wonder? I'd imagine that
the illegal codes would have been replaced if it did. Would like to
have more info on this thing.

Jason

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Next message: Raymond C. Bryan: "Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour"
Previous message: Craig LeVay: "Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour"
In reply to: Jason Robertson: "Re: Unsubstantiated "65100" rumour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.