Re: Another file question (PET)

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2002-11-20 17:39:14

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:58:55AM -0500, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> By 2001, do you mean the BASIC 1.0 static RAM PET?  I have a 2001
> that is, essentially, the american version of the 3001-32K...

Yes, I mean the old version with the small keyboard and BASIC 1.0.

> When I'm testing my BASIC 2.0 stuff under VICE, I select 3001 and all
> is well, just as it is on my 32K 2001-N.

The code is working for anything labeled 3xxx, 4xxx and 8xxx in VICE. The cc65
support library has some more problems with very old PETs, so I didn't bother
about the file routines not working.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.