Re: cbmlink -c serial and 6551

From: MagerValp (MagerValp_at_cling.gu.se)
Date: 2003-03-14 14:31:17

>>>>> "MM" == Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@hut.fi> writes:

MM> If I remember correctly, I measured some 16 kB/s transfer rates
MM> with the PC64 cable already in 1995 or so. The cbmlink server
MM> communicates with one interface at a time: it'll load a sector,
MM> send it to the PC, load another sector, and so on. With an IRQ
MM> loader on the serial or IEEE-488 bus, it could do a little better,
MM> but I don't think the time difference between parallel and serial
MM> connection would become any smaller in that way.

Wouldn't reading and writing whole tracks (with interleave) make it a
whole lot faster than just sequential sector writes? Or are we talking
about drives with a track buffer (like the 1581)?

-- 
    ___          .     .  .         .       . +  .         .      o   
  _|___|_   +   .  +     .     +         .  Per Olofsson, arkadspelare
    o-o    .      .     .   o         +          MagerValp@cling.gu.se
     -       +            +    .     http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.6.