Track/Sectors for older Drives, eg D9090

ncoplin_at_orbeng.com
Date: 2003-08-25 10:53:07

Hi All,

I'm a little confused about the track/sector information given by various
sources (including the Inner Space Anthlogy) for some of the older drives.
They talk also about cylinders... and that confuses me.

What I'm after is "logical" info, that is the layout a programmer would use.
I am thinking that the D9090 is laid out as: 918tracks (1-918), 32 sectors
(0-31). etc.

Can someone confirm this, and also the layouts of the other drives of this
era? is there a standardised detection routine for the D9060/9090? It seems
you can stick any mechanism in the box and it will work... but...

Regards, Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Achten [mailto:achten@gmx.de]
Sent: Thursday, 21 August 2003 5:25 AM
To: cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se
Subject: Re: Building an external CPU accelerator


> >>>>> "OA" == Oliver Achten <achten@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> OA> So perhaps a low-profile SuperCPU could look like the following:
> 
> OA> -64K high speed SRAM for caching the C64 area.
> OA> - 128K 29F010 ROM (55ns -> no delay) for BIOS/OS.
> OA> - 1 byte write cache
> OA> - mirroring disabled for $0000 - $01ff for faster execution
> OA> - expansion connector for hardwrare additions 
> OA> - perhaps a socket for a 512K sram chip?
> 
> Considering that you just listed the hardware features of the SCPU, in
> what way would your project be simpler..? :)

The biggest simplification lies in  the lack of defining windows for certain
memory areas for faster memory writes. The SCPU has lots of registers for
this issue, this accelerator would have a fixed window @ $0000-01ff, the
most
important memory area in the system, to make it possible to integrate the
logic into a smaller CPLD. Using a fast ROM instead of enabling reads to the
SLOW
Roms for copying it into the ram also simplifies the circuit.

The best solution would be that in the end, the circuit would be simple
enough that everyone can re-build it without too much hassle.

-- 
COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
--------------------------------------------------
1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger!
2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualitätssieger!
3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Your Engineering Solutions Provider
http://www.orbeng.com.au/orbital/engineeringServices/engServices.htm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PLEASE TAKE NOTE:

The contents of this email (including any attachments) may be
privileged and confidential. Any unauthorised use of the contents
is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please advise us immediately (you can contact us by telephone
on +61 8 9441 2311 by reverse charge) and then permanently
delete this email together with any attachments. We appreciate
your co-operation.

Whilst Orbital endeavours to take reasonable care to ensure
that this email and any attachments are free from viruses or other
defects, Orbital does not represent or warrant that such is explicitly
the case

(C) 2003: Orbital Engine Company (Australia) PTY LTD and its
affiliates



       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.