The geek in me wants to suggest using SHA1 or SHA2 instead of MD5 even though I know the collision space for MD5 is massive and it's hard to imagine anyone deliberately trying to create a collision... still, if you're going to write something new, you might as well use the best hash algorithm out there. Justin Also, after saying something moderately useful, I wanted to make a joke about the BrainDOS comment from earlier. Why are we trying to do a denial of service on Jim? On Sep 16, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Brain wrote: > ruud.baltissen@apg.nl wrote: >> Hallo Ulf, >> >> >>> Well, there is this PHP based SearchDBC64: >>> >> >> If I understand the notes correctly, you need Apache and MySql as >> well. >> Don't know if the average computer user has them running on his PC. >> My >> tool is one single EXE that creates its own database using flat text >> files. But I see that T64 and TAP are supported and I even haven't >> thought >> about those file formats (too disk minded due to previous projects). >> > > I had thought about this type of SW (I have the same issue, lots of > files, lots of disks, etc.), and I think an online solution would be > best. My thoughts would be: > > * MD5s (like Ruud's solution) at the file and the archive level. > * Complete Diffs, with diff information archived (to show changes > between variants). Obviously, binary diff capable. > * Ability to show "aliases" (same files, different names), same D64 > image, different names > * Tracking of files in archives, with and without sector chains > (This file is the same, but it is stored differently in one image > from how it is stored in another image) > * Directory diffs (the same files are in both images, but they are > arranged differently) > * Ability to "group files" (These files are all part of Jumpman, > etc.) > * Ability to categorize files/images > * Ability to show "owners" of files/images (Multiple people could > use the same system, sharing categories/alias information, etc.) > * Ability to save actual files/images in repository, conditionally, > and conditionally mark it as "public". > * Notes. > > > I'd be happy to host such a solution, but I don't have the time to > create such a solution. The SearchDBC64 looks like a good start, > though. > > Jim > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2009-09-16 23:00:05
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.