On 2012-09-18, at 20:04, Jim Brain wrote: > As it was a late addition, I chose a quick and dirty solution. I defend it as: I believe there is no need to be defensive about anything here :-) > [...] It basically boils down to how much the OP wants to solder. Since /me is the OP, the answer is: I want it to be as academically pure as possible. As long as academic approach does not hinder practicality that is :-) In other words: I treat it as production quality. The balance and potential compromises have to be done between technical correctness and versatility of the solution and its cost plus power/footprint requirements. That means the most versatile and technically correct solution with the lowest cost and smallest power and footprint (both parts, and wiring/routing) requirements is most preferred. -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-09-18 20:00:06
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.