no for me a replacement with a 65816 would be like a sheep with 5 legs I consider that a replacement must be as close as possible of the original if I want a machine with new functionalities I buy the latest PC (except if the 65816 is some functionalities that makes the replacement extremely easy to used...) if one day I makes one, I'll probably use a WDC 65C02 plcc On 24/02/2018 00:11, Mia Magnusson wrote: > Den Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:52:06 +0000 skrev smf <smf@null.net>: >> On 23/02/2018 20:08, Michał Pleban wrote: >>> Sure, but the board for 6510 would have to be much more >>> complicated, and I am still not sure if tapping some signals from >>> the motherboard wouldn't be necessary. I am not sure if this would >>> be worth the effort. >> Probably not. How about >> http://westerndesigncenter.com/wdc/w65c816s-chip.cfm ? > I assume that everyone have had 65816 in their minds while discussing a > 6509 replacement. > > An interesting question though is how to handle that both 6509 and > 65816 provide more than 16 adress lines. Some kind of mux to select > 6509- or 65816-mode of addressing more than 64k? > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2018-02-24 06:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.