Den Fri, 2 Mar 2018 00:48:28 -0600 skrev Jim Brain <brain@jbrain.com>: > On 3/2/2018 12:08 AM, Jim Brain wrote: > > > > All tests passed except eh last one (read back). It failed. What > > does that mean? > > > Duh, read the ASM, got it. > > Is there a way to create more debug info on this test, so I can see > what you expected, and what you received? > > I *assume* it's because the RAM and the CPLD are fighting for the bus > (to be solved with a board rev), but it would be nice to know. But still, does this really need a new board rev? You already detect those cycles and you already control the P outputs, so as I said earlier just force P to $F or $E while reading/writing 0/1. $E would give the technically most correct result on a machine with less than 960k RAM, while $F would in practice work in all possible cases except for with some unknown hardware add-on that probably doesn't exist. -- (\_/) Copy the bunny to your mails to help (O.o) him achieve world domination. (> <) Come join the dark side. /_|_\ We have cookies. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2018-03-02 08:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.