On 03/13/2018 09:03 AM, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > Reply-To is already set to the list. So by just hitting "answer", mails should > go to the list. Unfortunatly not, I have to use 'reply all' to get to the list, if I just hit 'reply', the mail is sent to the one who wrote it. With the old software I only had to hit 'reply' to get to the list with 'reply-all' doing the same. When looking at the header, I also don't see a reply-to: line. I do see a 'Mail-Followup-To:' set to the list. Does this behave differently? Gerrit > > Regards > > > Uz > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:47:33AM +0100, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: >> On 03/12/2018 11:22 PM, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: >>> >>> What you say sounds a bit old-fashioned, but this list is partially >>> old-fashioned so it's ok:) >>> >>> There is RFC 2919 (from 2001) that describes the "List-Id" header. It was set >>> even by my old majordomo list manager. Most of todays mailing lists set this >>> header. Filtering should be based on this header, not on the "To:" field. >>> There's also a "Precedence:" header that marks the email as coming from a >>> list. >> >> There is only the little problem that Thunderbird does not allow me to >> filter for these fields. But it can filter for 'To:' without problems. >> >> You might still want to set the reply-to: Header BTW, otherwise a simple >> reply will not go to the list as it did before. >> >> Gerrit >> >> >> >Received on 2018-03-14 22:56:17
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.