> On 2018-03-14, at 23:53, Mia Magnusson <mia@plea.se> wrote: > >>> Isn't that a thing that the second version of "64 ultimate" is >>> intending to do? >> >> I was thinking more of real hardware. I will probably get a 64 >> ultimate, but it's little different from an emulator running on a >> computer in terms of how authentic it actually is. > > Isn't this ultimate thing the real thing? Depends how you look at it. For me it is. For smf it isn't. :-) > Or is it called something else? > The first version has ZIFs for > VIC/CPU/SID/CIAs but otherwise it's a completely new PCB that fits in a > classic C64 case, but with guaranteed fresh components and some > improvement. That's reloaded, not ultimate :-) -- SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/Received on 2018-03-15 01:00:24
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.