On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Michał Pleban <lists@michau.name> wrote: > Ethan Dicks wrote: > >> ... I think it's more likely to be code for a >> different processor architecture. > > I would suggest downloading a disassembler which can handle multiple > architectures (such as IDA) and throw the binary at it to see if one of > the architectures produces a meaningful disassembly. I don't recognize IDA as a product name. I've tried a couple of web-based disassemblers to no success yet. > Why does the dump start at 0002 not 0000? Because the first two bytes are the load address (being a save file from a PET). I shaved them off so my disassembly attempts didn't try to treat them as part of the instruction stream. -ethanReceived on 2018-03-27 16:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.