On 6/17/2018 2:42 PM, Hegedus, Istvan wrote: > I am missing here the GATE IN signal. That needs to be added just like > I added it in FPGATED. A transparent latch is needed to keep > r_w_6502's previous state when GATE IN (MUX) is low. When MUX is high > and AEC is not low r_w_7501 can be r_w_6502. > I would do the following (assuming gate_in is an input and r_w_latched > is a register). > > reg r_w_latched; > > always @(gate_in,r_w_6502) > begin > if(gate_in) > r_w_latched=r_w_6502; > end > > assign r_w_7501 = (aec ? r_w_latched : 'bz); > > Istvan > I missed GATE_IN, so added as per your notes above. compiler complains bitterly about the use of a latch. Would it be permissible to do: always @(negedge gate_in) begin if(!gate_in) r_w_latched <= r_w_6502; end and then: always @(*) begin if(aec & gate_in) r_w_7501 = r_w_6502; else if (aec & !gate_in) r_w_7501 = r_w_latched; else r_w_7501 = 'bz; end To skip the latch? -- Jim Brain brain@jbrain.com www.jbrain.comReceived on 2018-06-18 08:00:05
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.