Re: MOS8520R4 - 1988 vs. 1991

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:50:50 +0000
Message-ID: <0915c3d9-f301-2bc4-736a-6e80e77f29e4_at_null.net>
On 29/01/2020 17:28, Gerrit Heitsch wrote:

> For the beginning of the 80s, it wasn't bad either.
>
Compared to what?

Up against the ZX80 it was able to maintain a video display while
running basic, but with only 22 columns compared to the ZX80's 32
columns. Compared to the Atari 400/800 and arguably the Apple 2, the vic
20 was terrible.

It was bad but it was cheap and it was compromised in different ways to
the other bad and cheap computers available at the time.

The only thing really going for it was that at least it wasn't the TED
series, which had 40 column text but no sprites and not enough cpu power
to do them in software.
Received on 2020-05-30 00:33:54

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.