On 11/4/21 5:05 PM, Jim Brain wrote: > > Oh, no argument there, but at Commodore, cost alone drove the > discussion, not features (or too many of them). if they could get great > yields out and not have to buy outside, the vertical integration could > yield significant cost savings. So, the fact they used the 2114 in the > 64 and the newer PETs suggests they were sourcing 2114s cheaper than it > cost CBM to manufacture 6550s combined with the opportunity cost of > tying up their fab space for that IC in lieu of using it for other ICs. As far as I know, they also bought a RAM design from Micron, got junk, Micron admitted that it didn't work for them either, got sued and that was about the end of MOS making RAM. GerritReceived on 2021-11-04 18:01:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.