smf wrote: > Be careful how you design it, the 6509 based cbm2 pretty much did what > you're suggesting and programming them was terrible. The 6509 had an additional functionality: the memory bank for LDA (xx),Y and STA (xx), Y instrutions was selected separately. Without this kind of functionality, if you just change the memory bank with an I/O port then copying data between banks becomes practically impossible (or at least it would require an order of magnitude more effort) because you are always reading/writing the same bank that contains your code. But you are right that jumping between banks on the 6509 is a nightmare. Regards, Michau.Received on 2021-11-18 14:02:21
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.