On 12/27/21 12:10 PM, Julian Perry wrote: > Amongst my collection I have such a beastie - and I approve of this > message. With the resistor mod to enable digitization on the SID, it is > as close to perfection of the C64 as I've experienced. > > That said, I have a real soft spot for the 250469 board: it seems the > "classic" implementation of the C64. The HMOS-II VIC has the grey dots 'problem' though which can mess up demos with noise. Gerrit > *>> On 2021-12-27, at 10:01, Gerrit Heitsch <*gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de > <mailto:gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de>*> wrote: > >>> On 12/27/21 9:00 AM, Claudio Sánchez wrote: >>>> What's considered "the best" C64 hardware? >>>> Several VIC-II revisions had features or bugs that made them better or worse than others. >>>> The same for SID and other chips. >>>> And then the same for the motherboard itself. >>>> Then there are several things like hackability, repairability, reliability... >>>> What would be the "best" hardware overall? > >>> 250466 board with 6569R5 VIC and 6581R4AR SID. > >> Ditto. > > > > > > > */-- > Best regards, > Julian /mailto:jp_at_digitaltapestries.com <mailto:jp@digitaltapestries.com>Received on 2021-12-27 13:01:20
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.